| Author |
Message |
|
jed
|
Post subject: Weakest Cards  Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 1:05 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:07 am
Posts: 1045
|
|
What cards do you think are the most worthless?
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
Keyser
|
Post subject: Re: Weakest Cards Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 5:01 pm |
|
 |
| The Dark Platypus |
 |
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 12:48 am
Posts: 951
|
|
cyclododo?
Edit: In retrospect, it does make a good early game scout.
Last edited by Keyser on Tue Sep 29, 2009 5:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Zurken
|
Post subject: Re: Weakest Cards Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 5:18 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 8:01 pm
Posts: 526
|
it's from old sets, but Psychic Parasite!! never ever used it, and got almost dozen of them in domain..  they're not even for sale.. just waste of card - gain - possibility..
|
|
| |
|
|
|
headshot
|
Post subject: Re: Weakest Cards Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 5:52 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 9:12 am
Posts: 270
|
|
Prophetic Lunacy seems kind of unusable because of isolation 4. With isolation 1 it might be good, but still not overpowered (easy to prevent the ability by moving next to it or just removing the creature).
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Altren
|
Post subject: Re: Weakest Cards Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2009 1:42 am |
|
|
| Lead Developer |
 |
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2008 9:55 pm
Posts: 717
Location: Moscow, Russia
|
Keyser wrote: cyclododo?
Edit: In retrospect, it does make a good early game scout. headshot wrote: Prophetic Lunacy seems kind of unusable because of isolation 4. With isolation 1 it might be good, but still not overpowered (easy to prevent the ability by moving next to it or just removing the creature). I used deck with cyclododo and Prophetic Lunacy - works fine  Cyclododo moving in any corner, then cast Gaze of the Tyrant and Prophetic Lunacy on it.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
TheFlashPoint
|
Post subject: Re: Weakest Cards Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2009 2:14 am |
|
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 11:19 pm
Posts: 55
|
Zurken wrote: it's from old sets, but Psychic Parasite!! never ever used it, and got almost dozen of them in domain.. they're not even for sale.. just waste of card - gain - possibility.. This card can be combo'd with acmar's disruptor and icy encasement/entangle for the win. In fact, it would make a great addition to a human deck I just played with acmar's, aurora, and some glory granting building where you can pay 3 flux to gain a glory.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
jed
|
Post subject: Re: Weakest Cards Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2009 10:30 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:07 am
Posts: 1045
|
|
So all the cards are good? ok which one card do you think is the worst?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
kash
|
Post subject: Re: Weakest Cards Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2009 11:05 pm |
|
Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 12:08 am
Posts: 173
|
|
I would say the Ice Sheet, Mud Mogi, Land of Dreams, Workers Holiday, Rune of the Swift, Yarnaga's Lab Assistant, Shrine of Cathil, and Gleb's Revitalizing Elixir are all pretty bad
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SaintCheeseius
|
Post subject: Re: Weakest Cards Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 2:34 am |
|
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 10:35 am
Posts: 49
|
|
The shrine of Cathil is fine..
2 flux for a 2 vision building with 5 health?
It's a building...
Ice sheet, yea, not so great, mud mogi might have its uses...
Workers holidays is cool, i like it against things like dl cat > dank pit type thing, and for human, even better as they have no real cheap 1 domain buildings..
Rune of the swift, I used it once, was funny, is good for early ambushes where the opponents gets on a mountain and thinks they are safe
|
|
| |
|
|
|
kash
|
Post subject: Re: Weakest Cards Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 4:41 am |
|
Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 12:08 am
Posts: 173
|
|
Compare Shrine to Sphere of Radiance which also has 2 vision, 1 less health, and no domain requirement. 3 domain is a stupidly steep price to pay for 2 flux and 1 health.
For the others, its not that you can't come up with any scenario where they would be useful, it is that the use is so narrow that I can't see putting them in any deck, constructed or limited.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
